Today I committed to the PySNMP 4.x approach and began coding in earnest. Amazing how much faster things go when you have a commitment to the approach, you aren't constantly backing up and saying "wait a minute, shouldn't there be a better way", you just plow ahead and let the chips fall as they might.
I got the bulk of the TwistedSNMP Manager-side API reimplemented. That's the most important part, as the Agent-side was always just for testing the Managers (or applications using the managers). I had to do a bit of shivving to get the old API to work with PySNMP 4.x's storage of connection parameters in its OID-store.
Ran into the lack of a timeout mechanism rather thuddingly, will have to work on that.
Choosing to implement only the highest-level TwistedSNMP API against the highest-level PySNMP asynchronous API (plus the previously-created Twisted protocol/transport layer) made it easier than I was expecting to adapt the code. Anyway, more hacking likely later this evening, but for now I need to stand up, stretch, and de-intensify for a few hours.
Comments
2010-08-31 12:04
That template db idea is prett y neat. I have to say it's get ting pretty annoying downloadi ng database backups and [...]
2010-08-23 20:57
Yeah, in a similar boat with t he code I write... upshot, I'v e got some pretty good compat code in snakeoil, just w [...]
2010-08-22 08:40
Yeah, that's what I started do ing (the function to convert t o bytes), as I support down to 2.4. Thing is this is [...]
2010-08-22 06:28
Your blog aparently likes does n't handle the less than char (<) conversion all that wel l.. everything following [...]
2010-08-22 06:24
The annoying thing about suppo rting both py2k and py3k is th at you wind up having to get r ather explicit about you [...]
2010-08-16 00:48
The measure of a man, I have a lways thought, was - that he l oved. And was loved.
2010-08-15 21:28
Hmm, hadn't realized that was what dpush was for. I guess I 'll have to make the trunk a b ranch rather than a chec [...]
2010-08-15 20:43
For what it's worth, newer ver sions of bzr-svn will not remo ve existing revisions from you r mainline unless you ex [...]
2010-08-15 20:40
bzr-svn supports not inserting any unusual revision properti es, it just means that pushing your bzr revisions into [...]
2010-08-15 18:21
Hmm, maybe I missed something there. Do you mean merge supp ort as in being able to pull f rom N branches into your [...]
2010-08-15 17:45
Lack of merge support kills th e main benefit of bzr-svn over just using svk I'd argue. Personally, I'm *extreme [...]
2010-08-15 11:46
You might want to check out hg subversion
2010-07-25 14:02
> and would have no Trac integ ration The trac-bzr plugin[ 1] seems to provide good integ ration between bzr and t [...]
2010-07-13 21:47
I've always been fascinated wi th the Asterisk AMI interface. So much so that I married tha t fascination with the [...]
2010-07-03 21:32
Yes, only references in dicti onaries are replaced, so hold ing references in lists, tuple s, etceteras keeps them alive.